What's the profit?
Calculate exactly how our AI-based Insight Engine increases your profit!
Choose a use case:
Onboarding
Product development
Marketing
CRM
Onboarding
* Explanation of the example calculation
Close explanation
Explanation of the example calculation
The example calculation estimates the savings from the AI Concierge: through increased learning rates for new hires and for new members of projects.New hires
New employees, new internal appointments and the refilling of positions in projects – all of this requires onboarding into new tasks.Revenue
Productivity losses from onboarding employees into new positions cost between 1% and 2.5% of revenue. We assume 2.5%, since onboarding into new projects is not included here but causes additional costs. Source: MIT Sloan Management Review 46: Getting New Hires Up to Speed QuicklyAverage salary
According to a study, unnecessary duplicated work during onboarding costs 309 minutes per week, about 13% of working time. If you assume that new employees generate twice their salary in revenue, this results in a revenue loss of 26% of salary. Source: Asana Anatomy of Work Index 2019Effect of faster learning
With a 20% faster learning rate, an employee achieves in 10 months what previously took 12 months to learn. The onboarding costs fall accordingly, in this case by 2/12, i.e. 16.6%. With a 100% faster learning rate, the costs are halved – 25 employees with a salary of €75,000 and revenue of 15 million then lead to a revenue increase of 3.6%.Close explanation
* Explanation of the example calculation
If you subtract the share of duplicated work (see above), you get an increase of up to almost 30% through more effective sharing of knowledge content. With a 40% productivity increase, 29% of personnel costs could be saved: 71 employees would deliver the output that 100 employees deliver without the AI Concierge.
Close explanation
Explanation of the example calculation
The example calculation estimates the savings in the product development department from the AI Concierge.Duplicated work
About 11% of working time is lost on average to unnecessary duplicated work: the average working time spent on duplicated work is 5.7 hours, 14.25% of working time in a 40-hour week. About 29% of duplicated work is accepted deliberately, for example in order to learn. That leaves 4.1 hours of unnecessary duplicated work, about 11% of working time. Source: Panopto Knowledge and Productivity ReportFurther productivity gains through effective sharing of content
In a survey of employees, 74% estimated that the productivity gain from effectively sharing knowledge lies between 10% and 40%. (Source: TSIA State of KM Report)If you subtract the share of duplicated work (see above), you get an increase of up to almost 30% through more effective sharing of knowledge content. With a 40% productivity increase, 29% of personnel costs could be saved: 71 employees would deliver the output that 100 employees deliver without the AI Concierge.
Savings through greater efficiency
The possible savings are estimated as the direct personnel costs (employees × salary) multiplied by the improvements in duplicated work plus further productivity gains.
Example: 20 employees who work 20% more efficiently complete the tasks of 24 employees without the AI Concierge. 4 salaries are saved – at a salary of €75,000 this comes to €300,000.
Close explanation
* Explanation of the example calculation
If you subtract the share of duplicated work (see above), you get an increase of up to almost 30% through more effective sharing of knowledge content. With a 40% productivity increase, 29% of personnel costs could be saved: 71 employees would deliver the output that 100 employees deliver without the AI Concierge.
Close explanation
Explanation of the example calculation
The example calculation estimates the savings in the department from the AI Concierge.Duplicated work
About 11% of working time is lost on average to unnecessary duplicated work: the average working time spent on duplicated work is 5.7 hours, 14.25% of working time in a 40-hour week. About 29% of duplicated work is accepted deliberately, for example in order to learn. That leaves 4.1 hours of unnecessary duplicated work, about 11% of working time. Source: Panopto Knowledge and Productivity ReportFurther productivity gains through effective sharing of content
In a survey of employees, 74% estimated that the productivity gain from effectively sharing knowledge lies between 10% and 40%. (Source: TSIA State of KM Report)If you subtract the share of duplicated work (see above), you get an increase of up to almost 30% through more effective sharing of knowledge content. With a 40% productivity increase, 29% of personnel costs could be saved: 71 employees would deliver the output that 100 employees deliver without the AI Concierge.
Savings through greater efficiency
The possible savings are estimated as the direct personnel costs (employees × salary) multiplied by the improvements in duplicated work plus further productivity gains. Example: 20 employees who work 20% more efficiently complete the tasks of 24 employees without the AI Concierge. 4 salaries are saved – at a salary of €75,000 this comes to €300,000.Close explanation
CRM
* Explanation of the example calculation
Close explanation
Explanation of the example calculation
The example calculation estimates the revenue increase in sales from the AI Concierge.Customer churn
This value must be adapted to the industry / company. In SaaS, customer churn averages 17%. Source: SaaS Churn RateRevenue increase through improved up-/cross-selling
The increase of up to 29% is an example case from Salesforce. Source: 7 Ways CRM Can Increase Your SalesReduction in churn
The reduction in churn through CRM of up to 27% is another example case from Salesforce. Source: The 6 Biggest Benefits of CRMRevenue increase
The possible savings are estimated as revenue (customers × revenue / customer) multiplied by the revenue increase plus churn reduction relative to revenue (churn × relative churn reduction relative to churn).Close explanation